ARCHIVING THE CITY

for the city yet to come

Archive for June, 2011

an other order

Posted on June 14, 2011

Adrian Piper, Pretend not to know, 1989 Order may be private or public. A friend of mine owns an enormous collection of classical music. His CDs fill the walls of a whole big room, floor to ceiling. What is interesting here is that they are chronologically organized by the composer’s date of birth. The order is eccentric because, to his wife’s despair, the owner and recipient of that order is just one person. Then there is what we can call a public order. Here, there is a distance between the owner and the recipient. The word “order” acquires its double meaning of organization and directives for behavior. In this double interpretation, the owner of the order is the power structure. The order is codified…

orientation is impossible

Posted on June 2, 2011

Cities (I)
The official acropolis beggars the most colossal conceptions of modern barbarity. Impossible to express the dull light produced by the perpetually gray sky, the imperial glint of the barracklike buildings, the eternal snow on the ground. With a singular taste for enormity, they have reproduced all the classical marvels of architecture. I attend art exhibitions in spaces twenty times vaster than Hampton Court. And what paintings! A Norwegian Nebuchadnezzar commissioned the staircases of the ministries; even the flunkies that I was able to glimpse are more haughty than Brahmas and I shuddered at the colossal aspect of the caretakers and construction officials. Thanks to the ordering of buildings into squares, courtyards and enclosed terraces, cabdrivers have been kept out. The parks represent primitive nature detailed with superb technical mastery. The upper zone has inexplicable parts: an arm of the sea, with no boats, unrolls its layer of blue sleet between quays weighted with giant candelabra. A short bridge leads to a vaulted passage directly beneath the dome of the Sainte-Chapelle. This dome is an armature of artistically wrought steel, approximately fifteen thousand feet in diameter.

At several points on the copper foot bridges, the platforms, the stairways that wind around covered markets and pillars, I thought I could judge the depth of the city! It’s the wonder of it that I was unable to seize: what are the relative levels of the other districts above or below the acropolis? For today’s tourist, orientation is impossible. The business district is a circus built in a uniform style, with arcaded galleries. No shops to be seen. But the snow on the pavement is trampled; a few nabobs as rare as Sunday morning strollers in London are making their way toward a diamond-studded stagecoach. A few red velvet divans: they serve arctic beverages whose price varies from eight hundred to eight thousand rupees. To the notion of seeking out a theater in this circus, I would reply that the shops must contain dramas that are sordid enough. I think there is a police force, but the laws must be so strange that I give up trying to imagine what the rogues here must be like.

The suburb as elegant as any fine street of Paris has the advantage of air that is like light. The democratic element is made up of some hundred souls. Here too the houses don’t follow one another; the suburb loses itself bizzarely in the countryside, the “county” that fills up the eternal west of forests and prodigious plantations where savage gentlefolk hunt down their gossip columns by artificial light.

Arthur Rimbaud, Les Illuminations (poem above translated by John Ashbery)

new problems

Posted on June 1, 2011

There is a first, false idea that needs to be set aside, which is that the philosopher can speak about everything. This idea is exemplified by the TV philosopher: he talks about society’s problems, the problems of the present, and so on. Why is this idea false? Because the philosopher constructs his own problems, he is an inventor of problems, which is to say he is not someone who can be asked on television, night after night, what he thinks about what’s going on. A genuine philosopher is someone who decides on his own account what the important problems are, someone who proposes new problems for everyone. Philosophy is first and foremost this: the invention of new problems. –Alain Badiou. 2009. in conversation with…

  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers